This is where all download will be listed, utilizing the Page Add plugin.
File Name | S21-Policy-Stoa-11-AFF-Africa.docx |
File Size | 80.16 KB |
Date added | October 12, 2020 |
Category | Archived |
Tags | Debate, Policy, Season 21, Stoa |
Author | Vance Trefethen |
Case Summary: This case argues that US forces in Africa serve no useful purpose for US national security. They are merely targets for terrorism, and are just pouring gasoline on the “terrorism” fire they are trying to solve. Bringing them home would increase US national security.
NOTE: In every case, the red bracketed notations about END QUOTE and LATER IN THE SAME CONTEXT are added by the brief writer to help comply with the new Stoa evidence rules. When these appear in a contiguous text without any line separation, they indicate that we are merely not-reading the non-underlined portion of the evidence quote, even though it is still present. When they appear with line breaks around them, they indicate that we are moving from one part of the quoted article to more distant part of the article and the skipped text is not preserved nor presented in the brief.
If there are evidence quotes where the evidence contains underlined portions and non-underlined portions, you are still obligated by Stoa rules to enunciate (say out loud) the signals “END QUOTE” and “LATER IN THE SAME CONTEXT” to indicate you are skipping some non-underlined text – even if we do not have the bracketed markers there to remind you.