This is where all download will be listed, utilizing the Page Add plugin.
File Name | S21-LD-Stoa-20-NEG-Quality-of-Life.docx |
File Size | 60.57 KB |
Date added | December 14, 2020 |
Category | Archived |
Tags | Lincoln-Douglas, Season 21, Stoa |
This case is intended to counter my affirmative quality of life case. While stability is important, it’s growth that primarily impacts the lives of the citizens, especially the poor. Don’t forget that as the negative, the middle ground in the debate is yours. Own it. Make sure that you communicate to the judge that if stability is not clearly more important, you win the round.
The criterion of standard of living simply serves to make the measurement of success more precise since quality of life in and of itself can be vague. This criterion will be especially useful when interacting with your applications. However, feel free to run the case without the criterion if it complicates things or confuses you.
Be specific in your argumentation and impact your applications clearly. You will be far more persuasive if the judge can feel the impact of your examples.