This is where all download will be listed, utilizing the Page Add plugin.
File Name | S21-LD-Stoa-10-NEG-Human-Rights.docx |
File Size | 61.17 KB |
Date added | October 5, 2020 |
Category | Archived |
Tags | Lincoln-Douglas, Season 21, Stoa |
This case is intended to counter the affirmative human rights case. Your goal is to establish that, while growth may not in itself be sufficient for human rights, it is at the very least necessary. If you can prove its necessity even arguing on the middle ground, you have succeeded. As the negative, the middle ground in the debate is yours. Own it.
In addition, with this case you can also argue that growth is not only necessary but also primary in the fight for human rights. A stagnant economy restricts access to human rights, even if those protections technically exist by law. Use that impact to your advantage. Concrete analysis will persuade your judge far more effectively than statistics will.