This is where all download will be listed, utilizing the Page Add plugin.
File Name | S22-Policy-Stoa-61-NEG-Cybersecurity.docx |
File Size | 314.79 KB |
Date added | February 28, 2022 |
Category | Archived, Policy (Stoa) |
Author | Vance Trefethen |
Resolved: The United States federal government substantially reform the use of Artificial Intelligence technology
Case Summary: The AFF plan has the federal government contract out new cybersecurity arrangements for government agencies, all of which must use AI. They may also mention a system called “Mayhem,” which was demonstrated in a “Cyber Grand Challenge” competition of hackers trying to prove the value of their systems (although we don’t think their plan actually fiats the government has to use Mayhem). The first 8 solvency arguments apply to any AI cybersecurity, while the last 3 are specifically applying to why Mayhem won’t work (and isn’t topical – it’s not AI). You don’t need the last 3 if they don’t mention Mayhem. Scare the daylights out of the Negative team by road-mapping for the judge at the top of the 1nc that you and your partner are going to have either 8 or 11 Solvency arguments and 2 Disads. The “Segal” source may be cited by the AFF in their plan. He lists both pro’s and con’s of AI cybersecurity in his article, so it’s fair for both sides to be quoting him.